Free Praxis 5002 Practice Test Practice Question
Scenario/Extract:
The following accounts of a sporting event were written by two different authors. Account 1: On Tuesday, the amazing Wildcats triumphed over the lowly Hawks with a hard-won victory. While the helpless Hawks fought valiantly throughout the game, their offense could not compete with the Wildcats' powerhouse defense, ultimately giving the Wildcats a 37-14 win. Account 2: The Wildcats played unfairly throughout the game, which led to their undeserved victory over the Hawks on Tuesday night. The Wildcats' defense would have incurred many penalties had the referees noticed their tactics. Luck, rather than skill, gave them a lopsided win they did not deserve.
In evaluating the differences between the two accounts, a reader can infer that
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: In evaluating the two accounts, it's evident that the authors each supported a different team in the game described, as their perspectives highlight contrasting opinions about key moments and player performances. This divergence indicates personal biases tied to team loyalty.
Option A is incorrect because a shared point of view would lead to similar narratives, which is not the case here. Option B is unlikely since different newspapers often have varied reporting styles and biases. Option D lacks support from the texts, as neither account suggests referee favoritism, focusing instead on team performance and individual players.
Unlock All Questions
Subscribe to Premium for full access to all practice questions, detailed rationales, and performance tracking.
Subscribe Now